ArticleMolecular biology reports2026
Screening optimum reference genes for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis in invasive apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata under different conditions.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe golden apple snail (Pomacea spp.), a globally significant invasive aquatic species, poses serious threats to biodiversity, agricultural production, and public health. Although real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is a widely used and robust technique for gene expression analysis, relatively few studies have applied it to quantify gene expression in Pomacea spp. The selection of stable reference genes is essential for accurate mRNA quantification in RT-qPCR. METHODS AND
resultsIn this study, we systematically evaluated nine candidate reference genes (ACT, H3, UBI, EF1-α, TUB, GAPDH, 18 S, PRAP and AK) in P. canaliculata across various developmental stages, multiple tissue types, and under extreme temperature conditions. Using a comprehensive set of algorithms (geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, the ΔCt method, and RefFinder), we determined that the use of three reference genes was optimal for normalization, as supported by pairwise variation values above 0.15 under all experimental conditions. The most stable gene combinations were identified as follows: UBI, ACT, and AK for developmental stages; 18 S, GAPDH, and ACT for tissue comparisons; AK, PRAP, and ACT under cold stress; and ACT, H3, and UBI under heat stress. The expression of SACS, which encodes sacsin molecular chaperone gene, was used to validate the selected reference genes. Results confirmed that the use of unstable reference genes led to significant quantification bias, whereas the multi-gene normalization strategy markedly improved accuracy.
conclusionThese findings provide reliable, condition-specific reference gene sets for future gene expression studies in P. canaliculata, offering crucial methodological support for molecular research on this invasive species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42363971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.