ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Epigenetic Markers of Cell Division and Ageing in Relation to Breast Cancer Survival.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a major challenge to public health. Biomarkers may be useful to improve prediction of breast cancer survival. Several epigenetic markers of cell division and ageing based on DNA methylation have been proposed. In this study, we measured these epigenetic markers in breast tumours and assessed their prognostic value. We used genome-wide DNA methylation data measured in 1992 breast cancer tumours from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study and publicly available datasets. We calculated four markers of cell division (epiTOC2, stemTOC, MiAge and CellDRIFT), two markers of chronological age (Horvath age and BTEC), and four markers of biological age (PhenoAge, GrimAge, MRscore and DunedinPACE). Cox regression models were used to assess the associations of age-adjusted epigenetic markers with 5-year overall survival, with adjustment for clinical variables. Effect modification by estrogen receptor (ER) status and molecular subtype was also investigated. After adjustment for age and stratification by study, higher levels of cell division markers were associated with poorer survival (e.g., epiTOC2: per one-standard-deviation increase, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.27), whereas higher chronological age markers were linked to better prognosis (e.g., Horvath age: HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61-0.82). Epigenetic markers of biological age showed variable associations. These associations were partly explained by the main clinicopathological variables at diagnosis and varied across subtypes. Our study revealed associations of several epigenetic markers with breast cancer survival. The associations were quite weak, suggesting these markers may have limited prognostic value. The varying associations observed among subtypes may reflect underlying biological differences that should be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.