ArticleNucleic acids research2026
bio.tools: an expanded web service for research software in the life sciences.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational methods are central to the life sciences. The rapid growth and diversification of software tools and databases make it difficult to find, compare, and reuse methods for a given task. bio.tools is a community-driven registry designed to improve the visibility of research software and allow researchers to simplify access to the software ecosystem through structured, interoperable, and accessible metadata. Tools are annotated using the EDAM ontology and additional controlled vocabularies, enabling users to search and filter by scientific topics, operations, input/output data types, and data formats. bio.tools supports interactive exploration via rich tool landing pages and provides programmatic access through a documented API for search, retrieval, and registry statistics. The registry has expanded to almost 33,000 annotated tools through the combined contributions of thousands of community members and semi-automated literature mining that keep the registry up to date. Recent improvements to the registry include machine-assisted scoring to prioritise curator review, and consolidation of both its standards stack and software architecture. bio.tools has also become a foundational upstream metadata source that is reused by other services in the ELIXIR Research Software Ecosystem and beyond, to support synchronisation, cross-linking, and additional downstream services. bio.tools is freely available at https://bio.tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.