ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Optimal Organelle Inheritance Strategies Under Different Changing Environments and Mutational Pressures.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA encode essential cellular apparatus. This organelle DNA exists at high copy number (ploidy) in eukaryotic cells, which must both mitigate mutational damage and allow adaptation to changing demands. Across eukaryotes, organelle DNA is inherited and maintained by different classes of processes. Inheritance is often maternal, but some species use paternal or doubly uniparental (sex-dependent) inheritance, with different extents of "leakage" of organelle DNA from the non-primary parent. During development, genetic bottlenecks of different magnitudes and recombination-mediated repair are employed in different species. Here, we use modeling and simulation to investigate the fitness advantages, disadvantages, conflicts, and tradeoffs of these different strategies under different challenges of mutation and changes in selection imposed by the environment (in the absence of interactions with nuclear genes). We find a general tradeoff between maintaining heteroplasmy to support adaptation to environmental change and supporting purifying selection against dysfunctional mutants. Different combinations of leakage and bottleneck size provide optimal resolutions to this tradeoff under different sets of challenges. We connect our findings to biologically observed behaviors, including the universality of non-minimal bottleneck sizes, a tradeoff between high ploidy for heteroplasmy and repair and tight bottlenecks for segregation, and environmental dependence of the benefits of leakage and doubly uniparental inheritance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.