Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42363657›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2026

Qualitative Analysis of Community Dwelling Older Adults' Advance Care Planning Interviews: Patients Want a Chance.

Lucia D Wocial, Susan E Hickman, Kathleen Ziemba, Sarah Koch, Melissa Cavanaugh, Emily Fox Ludden, Alexia M Torke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucia D WocialCharles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4701-0794
Susan E HickmanIndiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kathleen ZiembaRespecting Choices, Respecting Choices®, A Program of WiserCare, Inc., Oregon, WI, USA.
Sarah KochPalliative Care, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Melissa CavanaughPalliative Care, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Emily Fox LuddenIndiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-2503-1435
Alexia M TorkeIndiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

POST Facilitation for Community Dwelling Older Adults with and without DementiaR01AG056618 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI TORKE, ALEXIA MARY · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
Understanding the needs and experiences of surrogate decision makers caring for SGM individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.K24AG053794 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TORKE, ALEXIA MARY · 2016 to 2025
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG053794NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundOlder adults living with serious illnesses face challenging decisions with illness progression. Advance Care Planning (ACP) presents an opportunity to explore values and goals, absent the pressure of time-sensitive decisions.ParticipantsCommunity-dwelling adults ≥65 with an estimated 33% mortality risk, and if invited by the participant, the person who would serve as their surrogate decision maker (SDM).SettingPrimary care practices in a Midwest metro area. Interviews occurred in the patient's home or other preferred location.MethodsQualitative, descriptive study analyzing ACP conversations that used the Respecting Choices Advanced Steps (RCAS) framework, which includes the opportunity to complete an Indiana POST form. Interviews were conducted at baseline and 1 year later. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, and then analyzed using an inductive content analysis approach.FindingsParticipants included 22 patients and 8 potential surrogates. Themes included reasons for ACP, living well, and impact of serious illness. When expressing preferences for future treatment, many participants selected limited interventions until they realized this did not include cardiopulmonary resuscitation. After learning this, participants often selected full intervention and full code because they wanted a chance to re-establish an acceptable quality of life.ConclusionSome older adults with a high mortality risk desire resuscitation and ICU care because they want a chance at getting back to a preferred state of living well. If a patient survives these interventions, SDMs are likely to encounter decisions about whether further life-sustaining treatment can achieve a patient's goals and values and their perspectives on what living well means.

Indexed as

decision makingethicsgoals of carepalliative carePOLSTrespecting choicestreatment preference

Identifiers

PMID42363657
PMCPMC13439891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.