ArticlePain research & management2026
The Association Between Physical Activity and Epigastric Pain: A Mendelian Randomization and Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Pain research & management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Association Between Physical Activity and Epigastric Pain: A Mendelian Randomization and Cross-Sectional Study.Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between physical activity (PA) and epigastric pain is not well established. This study uniquely combined Mendelian randomization (MR) for causal inference with a cross-sectional analysis for epidemiological validation.
methodsWe performed an MR analysis using inverse variance weighting (IVW) as the primary method. For the cross-sectional study, we analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), categorizing PA (leisure-time, occupational, and transportation) according to U.S. GUIDELINES:
resultsGenetically predicted walking for pleasure was inversely associated with epigastric pain (IVW OR = 0.966, 95% CI: 0.948-0.985, P = 3.912 × 10
conclusionsThe integration of genetic and observational evidence demonstrates that the effect of PA on epigastric pain is context-dependent. Leisure-time PA is protective, whereas occupation-related PA may increase risk. These findings highlight the context-dependent role of PA in gastrointestinal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.