Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42363566›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026

Determining the utility of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology for disaster victim identification (DVI).

Makena P McLean, Vienna C Lam, Megan Bassendale, Gail S Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Makena P McLeanSchool of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2130-2506
Vienna C LamSchool of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2297-5397
Megan BassendaleForensic Guardians International Consulting Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9006-2880
Gail S AndersonSchool of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1172-7953

Funding

American Academy of Forensic SciencesSimon Fraser University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radio frequency identification (RFID) technology was evaluated as a method for electronically tracking human remains and associated identifying information during mass fatality incidents. Conventional tags are prone to physical damage and failure, which can compromise identification processes and hinder the repatriation of bodies. Nine types of uniquely numbered RFID tags were deployed in decompositional and burial environments to assess the survivability of different types of RFID tags buried, inserted, and attached to pig carcasses. The best method of insertion or attachment to keep tags in situ, and whether physical writing in pencil or permanent marker remained on the tags' surfaces. In a series of four studies of whole carcasses, pieces of tissue, as human proxies, and burials in soil, all but two tags were determined to be viable throughout the decomposition process. All tags displayed movement issues, so bone attachment sites are recommended. Handwritten labels on the tags prepared under dry conditions and when protected from decompositional fluids held up better than writing interacting with the fluids. We found the most useful tags were the LF Yellow Ear Tag and the UHF White Tag.

Indexed as

DisastersDisaster VictimsPostmortem ChangesRadio Frequency Identification DeviceAnimalsBone and BonesBurialForensic AnthropologyHumansModels, AnimalSwinedecompositiondisaster taggingdisaster victim identification (DVI)forensic identificationradio frequency identification (RFID)unidentified remains

Identifiers

PMID42363566
PMCPMC13534878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.