ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2026
Host genotype and edaphic factors shaped bacterial communities associated with native and endemic medicinal Artemisia species in arid environment.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlant-associated microbiomes are key contributors to plant nutrition and stress tolerance, particularly in arid ecosystems where extreme abiotic conditions strongly shape plant-microbe interactions. Despite this, the abiotic drivers of microbiome assembly across different plant compartments in wild medicinal species from these environments remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated bacterial community structure across multiple niches, including bulk soil, rhizosphere, root, and shoot, in three wild Artemisia species (Artemisia herba-alba Asso., Artemisia negrei L., and Artemisia mesatlantica Maire), the latter two being endemic to arid regions of Morocco.
resultsUsing amplicon sequencing, we observed diverse bacterial associations with each plant niche harboring distinct taxa. Host plant species significantly influenced bacteriome composition (p = 0.026), particularly in Artemisia mesatlantica, which hosted the most specific bacterial taxa compared to its other relatives. Plant compartment emerged as key drivers of belowground bacterial community assembly with additional structuring by host species and edaphic factors. Soil pH, calcium carbonate content, organic matter and electrical conductivity were strongly correlated with shifts in bacterial diversity and composition, emphasizing the role of soil physicochemical properties as an environmental filter under extreme alkaline and arid conditions. Despite these species- and environment-specific variations, a conserved core bacteriome was identified across all Artemisia species, and compartments except shoot, comprising of Bacillus, Microvirga and Rhizobium.
conclusionOur results demonstrate that the interplay between host identity and soil properties orchestrates distinct, yet functionally coherent bacterial communities in wild Artemisia species. Bacterial taxa identified as core are well-known for their roles in plant growth promotion, biocontrol and production of bioactive secondary metabolites. The persistence of this core bacterium comprising of Bacillus, Microvirga and Rhizobium suggests a stable association across hosts and compartments, potentially reflecting conserved ecological roles, although functional contributions were not directly assessed in this study. Overall, our findings reveal how the interplay between soil properties and host identity shapes the assembly of distinct, yet compositionally consistent bacterial communities in wild medicinal Artemisia species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.