ArticleBMC research notes2026
A simple scanner-based colorimetric method for fluoride determination using Alfusone reagent.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe quantitative determination of fluoride ions is important for water quality monitoring and public health. This study aimed to develop a simple and simultaneous multi-sample digital colorimetric method for fluoride determination using a 96-well plate and a flatbed scanner, without requiring conventional analytical instruments.
resultsFluoride solutions were color-developed using Alfusone reagent in a 96-well plate and scanned with a flatbed scanner. Color information was extracted from the scanned images and analyzed using red-green-blue (RGB), cyan-magenta-yellow-key (CMYK), hue-saturation-value (HSV), CIE XYZ, and CIELAB parameters. Among the evaluated parameters, the HSV H parameter showed the lowest limit of detection and limit of quantification of 0.086 and 0.29 mg/L, respectively. The CIELAB b* parameter showed the lowest values among the evaluated CIELAB parameters, with a limit of detection and limit of quantification of 0.19 and 0.64 mg/L, respectively. These values were below the World Health Organization guideline value for fluoride and the Japanese drinking water quality standard. Spike-and-recovery tests using bottled and tap water showed that the R and a* parameters provided recoveries closer to 100% than b*. The method offers a simple, attachment-free approach that enables simultaneous analysis of multiple samples and calibration standards using commercially available reagents and office automation equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.