ArticleBMC nursing2026
Nurse's perspectives on continuing professional development at Zomba Central Hospital, Malawi: a qualitative inquiry.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuing Professional Development (CPD) is a fundamental component of nursing practice, facilitating the ongoing acquisition of knowledge and skills beyond initial training. It serves as a mechanism for nurses to remain abreast of current advancements, fostering their professional development and ultimately enhancing the delivery of quality patient care. However, in low-resource settings like Malawi, limited evidence exists regarding nurses' perspectives on CPD, particularly, alignment of CPD programmes with nurses' clinical needs and practice realities. The study aimed at exploring nurses' perspectives on CPD at Zomba Central Hospital (ZCH), Malawi. The specific objectives of the study were to; explore nurses' perceived CPD needs, examine the congruency of nurses' needs and their participation in CPD programmes, explore nurses' experiences of CPD programme delivery, and asses the factors that influence participation in CPD programmes.
methodsThis study employed a qualitative interpretive design. Using purposive sampling, 15 nurses were interviewed. Data were collected through interview guide and analyzed using thematic analysis. Coding and theme development were conducted to enhance consistency and credibility.
resultsFive themes were identified. Nurses actively identify their learning needs through self-assessment and clinical practice often with inadequate institutional coordination. CPD was perceived as important for professional development contributing to improved knowledge, clinical skills, confidence and patient care. There is a perceived misalignment between CPD programmes and nurses' needs, particularly in practical skill development. Current CPD set up lack post-training mentorship and support thereby constraining the application of learning in practice. Some CPD sessions are relevant to departmental needs, but many lack practical applicability and fail to address the knowledge gaps. Diverse interactive learning resources are highly valued. Most CPD facilitators lack expertise and proficiency in teaching skills. Barriers to CPD participation include scheduling conflicts, workload pressures, and financial obstacles such as limited access to data bundles and transportation costs.
conclusionExploring nurses' perspectives on CPD at Zomba Central Hospital assisted in determining the relationship between nurses' actual needs and the CPD programmes in which they engage. CPD is valued by nurses but is not often aligned with their clinical needs. Strengthening needs-based and practice-oriented CPD, institutional coordination and mentorship, and addressing structural barriers may enhance participation and translate learning into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.