ArticleBMC surgery2026
Clinical efficacy of de-epithelialized flap for reconstruction of pressure ulcers in the buttocks and trochanteric regions.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of the De-Epithelialized Flap technique in the reconstruction of pressure ulcers in the buttocks and trochanteric regions.
methodsA total of 29 patients with pressure ulcers in the buttocks and trochanteric regions were treated from January 2018 to November 2021, including 16 cases in the sacrococcygeal region, 4 in the intertrochanteric region, and 9 in the ischial tuberosity. Early debridement and drainage were performed to remove necrotic tissue and sinus tracts, followed by repair of the pressure ulcers using the De-Epithelialized Flap. The flap's length in the advancement direction should measure approximately 1.5-2 times the diameter of the defect, with the width slightly exceeding that of the wound. Excess tissue at the recipient site is de-epithelialized and used to fill the dead space.
resultsAmong the patients, 27 cases achieved primary healing of the skin flaps, while 2 cases experienced delayed wound healing. These wounds were successfully managed with dressing changes and debridement. During a follow-up period of 6-12 months, only 1 case of recurrence at the same site was observed.
conclusionThe use of the De-Epithelialized Flap for the repair of pressure ulcers in the buttocks and trochanteric regions offers the benefits of being a simple, safe, and effective procedure with a low recurrence rate. This technique demonstrates promising clinical value and is recommended for broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.