ArticleTrials2026
Research exploring monetary incentives for recruiting and retaining participants in randomised controlled trials: a scoping review.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoor participant recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is a widespread challenge. Offering trial participants monetary incentives (e.g. cash or vouchers) may boost recruitment and retention; however, no reviews have systematically mapped the existing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method evidence on this topic. We therefore conducted a scoping review aiming to map the extent and type of available research examining monetary incentives for recruiting and retaining trial participants to identify critical areas where evidence remains sparse.
methodsWe included empirical studies examining the use of monetary incentives for recruiting or retaining participants in RCTs (excluding phase I trials). Case studies, protocols, and reviews without a systematic search strategy were excluded. Searches were run in the ORRCA database until the end of 2019 when it was last updated, and CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, and EconLit from 2020 onwards.
resultsOut of 5421 identified records, 145 studies from 141 sources met our inclusion criteria. Monetary incentives were primarily studied in the context of trial retention (39%; 56/145) or trial participation more broadly (33%; 48/145), with many studies not specifying the format (61%; 88/145) or value (40%; 58/145) of monetary incentives in question. Additionally, the vast majority of studies were conducted in the USA (48%; 69/145) or UK (34%; 49/145), with very little research activity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (9%; 13/145). Monetary incentives for recruiting or retaining trial participants were most often explored in the context of cross-sectional surveys (21%; 30/145), of which most involved members of the public being asked about hypothetical trial scenarios (53%; 16/30), rather than individuals actively invited to or involved in a trial.
conclusionsThis scoping review consolidates available research on monetary incentives for recruiting and retaining trial participants. Less research is needed involving members of the public being asked about monetary incentives for a hypothetical trial. Rather, we need more qualitative studies exploring the perspectives of trial staff responsible for their implementation, as well as randomised studies within a trial (SWATs) assessing cost-effectiveness alongside effectiveness. Furthermore, more research is needed exploring the use of monetary incentives in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.