ArticleBMC medical education2026
How do mature non-graduate students compare to the rest of the cohort in medical training? A UKMED study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWidening participation in medicine is a key societal priority. To improve representation of non-traditional applicants, UK medical schools use contextual admissions, although definitions of under-represented groups vary across institutions. This study examined the educational and training trajectories of one such group-mature non-graduates. We aimed to determine whether their progression was comparable to that of school-leavers and graduate entrants, whether they progressed through medical school non-inferiorly, and whether they were equally likely to secure postgraduate training posts.
methodsData on UK medical students and resident doctors (2007-2015) were extracted from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED). Undergraduate performance (Educational Performance Measure (EPM), Prescribing Safety Assessment (PSA), Foundation Programme Situational Judgement Test (FP-SJT) and postgraduate performance (Membership of the Royal College of Physicians, MRCP and MRCGP Applied Knowledge Test, MRCGP AKT), Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP), and obtaining an offer for a Level 1 training post) were compared across the three groups using multivariate statistical analyses, including Kruskal-Wallis tests where appropriate.
resultsAcross all measures of undergraduate academic attainment (EPM, PSA and FP-SJT) and postgraduate examination performance (MRCP Part 1, Part 2 and PACES), mature non-graduates performed less well than school-leavers or graduates. They were more frequently released from training (ARCP Outcome 4) and received higher numbers of Developmental ARCP outcomes. Mature non-graduates were also less likely to receive an offer for competitive specialty training on their first application; however, the likelihood of them applying exclusively to General Practice did not differ from that of school-leavers or graduates.
conclusionsAlthough performance differences persist for a subset of widening-participation candidates named here as mature non-graduates, they still progress through training, obtain Certificates of Completion of Training, and contribute to the medical workforce. Further research is needed to examine how their life experience and non-traditional educational trajectories influence their long-term practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.