ArticleBMC medicine2026
Social isolation and loneliness associate with early menopause and mortality in women: a UK Biobank cohort study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social Isolation, Loneliness and Subclinical Atherosclerosis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReproductive aging is an emerging public health priority amid demographic shifts. Early menopause (EM), indicative of accelerated reproductive aging, is associated with an elevated risk of premature mortality. While social isolation (SI) and loneliness (LO) are established psychosocial determinants of health, their associations with EM and their combined effects with menopausal status on mortality risk remain unquantified. This study investigated the associations of SI and LO with EM and all-cause mortality.
methodsThis study included 79,578 Caucasian women from the UK Biobank cohort, of whom 6,778 experienced EM (menopause at age 40-45) and 72,800 experienced normal menopause (NM, age 46-55). SI (score: 0, 1, ≥2) was derived from three indicators: living arrangement, frequency of social contact, and participation in social activities; LO (score 0-2) was assessed based on self-reported loneliness and frequency of confiding in someone close. Multivariable-adjusted models were used to evaluate the odds of EM. All-cause mortality risk was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by menopause status.
resultsHigher levels of SI and LO were independently associated with an increased prevalence of EM (e.g. SI ≥ 2: OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.20; LO = 2: OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25). Critically, the detrimental impact of social adversity on survival was significantly greater in women with EM compared to those with NM. After full adjustment, women with EM and SI index ≥ 2 had a 55% increased mortality risk (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.21-1.99), whereas the risk increase for women with NM was 17% (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.28). A similar pattern was observed for LO (e.g. LO = 2, EM: HR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.88 vs. NM: HR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27). Moreover, Kaplan-Meier curves showed a progressively wider survival gap between EM and NM as SI/LO levels increased. Lower SI and LO were associated with lower EM-related excess mortality.
conclusionsSI and LO were associated with EM and premature mortality. Women with EM are especially vulnerable to the negative effects of social adversity. Integrating psychological and social support into menopause care is essential, and reducing SI and LO may promote healthier aging.
trial registrationNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.