ArticleBMC health services research2026
Shifting power: co-developing a framework for equity in healthcare.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEfforts to advance equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in healthcare have grown quickly in recent years, spurred by the broader calls to confront systemic racism and address structural inequities exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. While EDI initiatives have gained visibility across various healthcare domains, such as patient safety, quality improvement, and social innovation, there are questions about how deeply they engage with the systemic roots of inequity. The objective of this paper is to describe the development of a framework designed to guide healthcare organizations in advancing EDI through a process focused on disrupting systems of oppression and present the resulting framework for building EDI into health care practices, processes, and policies.
methodsOur large team used a collaborative co-development approach involving a diverse advisory group of people with lived/living experiences of structural inequities, as well as healthcare providers, academics, and leaders. A rapid evidence scan was conducted to synthesize key definitions and existing frameworks. Through a series of virtual and in-person meetings, the advisory group refined a framework iteratively to embed an intersectional, anti-oppressive lens into healthcare improvement.
resultsThe co-development process generated a health equity framework that emphasized the need to recognize systems of oppression and the creation of EDI initiatives that prioritize the disruption of these systems. The framework came about through multiple iterations based on advisory group feedback, eventually leading to a set of commitments that guide how it is used. These commitments include acknowledging intersectionality, embracing anti-oppression, fostering good relationships, building trauma literacy, and a commitment to learning and unlearning. The framework focuses on improving care for patients, caregivers, and communities, and is meant to guide work within organizations and across healthcare systems.
conclusionThis paper highlights the importance of grounding EDI initiatives in a critical understanding of systems of power and oppression. An equity-oriented approach to healthcare improvement needs more than just inclusion efforts; it demands ongoing critical reflexivity and deliberate disruption of the structures that produce inequity. This co-developed framework provides a foundation for health organizations to advance EDI in a meaningful way, while recognizing the need for constant evaluation, learning, and adaptation over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.