ArticleBMC health services research2026
Prevention and preparedness for missing episodes in the care of persons living with dementia in Sweden - a document study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople living with dementia are more vulnerable, which increases the risk of harm during a missing episode. Although national guidelines exist for dementia care there are no specific standards for preventing, managing, or following up on missing episodes among people living with dementia in care settings. This study aimed to describe and analyse current local documents and checklists used in elderly care and home care services in Swedish municipalities, focusing on prevention and preparedness for missing episodes, and to identify key areas for improvement.
methodsA multiple document case study was conducted using materials from one county council and eight municipalities, including care homes and home care services, examining instructions, checklists, and routines for situations where a person living with dementia is at risk of going missing or has gone missing, one or several times.
resultsFindings revealed substantial gaps in all participants documents, particularly regarding the updates of the documents, lack of preventive measures except technical solutions, delays of police notification due to inadequate instructions in case of a missing incident, limited understanding of risks and of police procedures as well as insufficient collaboration, Moreover, the decision to contact the police could be delayed for several hours and, in some cases, even days. Neither the resident nor their next of kin were actively involved in any preventive activities or risk assessments.
conclusionsLocal guidelines and checklists in Swedish elderly- and home care services demonstrated substantial deficiencies in the prevention and preparedness of missing episodes involving persons living with dementia. Fundamental elements of preparedness were also lacking, including knowledge‑based collaboration with the police. Taken together, the findings suggest that admission to elderly care with exclusive emphasis on voluntariness and freedom does not necessarily increase safety for persons living with dementia. Safety and person‑centred care should be understood as mutually reinforcing rather than competing objectives. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.