Trial reportBMC pediatrics2026
A school-year mini basketball curricular program promotes fundamental movement skills of urban Chinese preschoolers with typical development.
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a school-year skill-based mini basketball program on the fundamental movement skills (FMS) of urban Chinese preschoolers. A cluster randomized trial was conducted, in which 18 intact classes were randomly assigned to either the mini basketball (MB; 9 classes) or conventional physical education (CP; 9 classes) group. Children in the MB group received the MB curricular intervention, while the CP group received regular physical education curriculum representing standard practice in urban Chinese preschools. Motor development was evaluated by the Test of Gross Motor Development 2nd Edition. The results of the 2 × 2 (time × group) multivariate analysis of variance with repeated measures showed that the MB program was associated with greater improvements in FMS compared to the CP program, suggesting an added benefit beyond typical developmental progression. Our findings also revealed that the effects of MB on object control were influenced by age, with four- and five-year-old children demonstrating greater improvements than three-year-olds. These findings suggest that MB appears to be a feasible and potentially effective intervention to promote FMS development in preschool settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.