ArticleBMC health services research2026
Communication failure during operating room turnover: a HFACS-informed qualitative case study of system-level coordination.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo examine how communication failures develop across multiple system levels during operating room (OR) turnovers and to generate insights for system-level improvement using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification as an interpretive framework.
backgroundOperating room turnovers are high-risk transitional periods requiring rapid multidisciplinary coordination. Communication breakdowns during turnovers are a major contributor to perioperative adverse events. However, existing analyses often focus on individual communication errors, with limited attention to the latent organizational and contextual factors shaping frontline communication and coordination.
methodsA qualitative single-case study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in China focusing on an information-rich OR turnover incident. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with five healthcare professionals involved in OR turnover coordination. Data were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step method. HFACS was subsequently employed as a systems-oriented interpretive framework to support understanding of relationships among the identified themes across organizational, supervisory, environmental and frontline levels.
resultsSix interrelated themes were identified: information transmission bias, absence of standardized communication protocols, fragmented interprofessional coordination, inconsistent institutional norms, inadequate alignment between skills and roles and insufficient information technology support. Together, these findings suggested a pattern of communication failure in which organizational constraints, supervisory limitations and operational pressures interacted to influence frontline communication and coordination during OR turnovers.
conclusionThe findings highlight that communication failures during OR turnovers arise from interacting system-level factors rather than isolated individual errors. Understanding these mechanisms may support safer coordination processes, improve service reliability and reduce communication-related patient safety risks in high-intensity surgical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.