Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42363133›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2026

Immuno-oncology in the perioperative setting: the next frontier in resectable head and neck cancers - a systematic review.

Akhil Kapoor, Anuj Gupta, Bipinesh Sansar, Bal Krishna Mishra, Nandini Menon, Minit Shah, Vanita Noronha, Kumar Prabhash

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Akhil KapoorDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, 221005, India. kapoorakhil1987@gmail.com.
Anuj GuptaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Bipinesh SansarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Bal Krishna MishraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Nandini MenonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Minit ShahDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Vanita NoronhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perioperative immunotherapy-particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce recurrence in resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Despite standard multimodal therapy, nearly half of patients experience relapse within five years. ICIs such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab have transformed recurrent/metastatic HNSCC, and their integration into curative settings is under active investigation.We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and major oncology conference proceedings (2018-2026) to identify clinical trials evaluating ICIs in the perioperative setting of HNSCC. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Outcomes of interest included safety, pathological response, event-free or disease-free survival (EFS/DFS), and overall survival (OS). Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneous study designs.Twenty-five studies (18 published, 7 conference abstracts) met inclusion criteria. Neoadjuvant ICI monotherapy was safe but showed modest major pathological response (MPR) rates (~ 6%). Combination strategies were more effective: the IMCISION trial reported 35% MPR with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. 17% with nivolumab alone. Neoadjuvant therapy did not delay surgery. In the adjuvant setting, the NIVOPOSTOP trial showed improved 3-year DFS with nivolumab plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy (63.1% vs. 52.5%). The KEYNOTE-689 trial showed perioperative pembrolizumab significantly improved EFS (51.8 vs. 30.4 months), leading to FDA approval in PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 tumors.Pathologic response correlated with improved survival. Ongoing trials are refining biomarkers, combinations, and sequencing. Perioperative immunotherapy is reshaping curative-intent management of HNSCC, establishing a new multidisciplinary treatment paradigm.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapySquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPerioperative CareAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCheckpoint inhibitorsHead and neck squamous cell carcinomaNeoadjuvant therapyNivolumab and pembrolizumabPerioperative immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42363133
PMCPMC13560393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.