SynthesisBMC cancer2026
Immuno-oncology in the perioperative setting: the next frontier in resectable head and neck cancers - a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perioperative immunotherapy-particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce recurrence in resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Despite standard multimodal therapy, nearly half of patients experience relapse within five years. ICIs such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab have transformed recurrent/metastatic HNSCC, and their integration into curative settings is under active investigation.We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and major oncology conference proceedings (2018-2026) to identify clinical trials evaluating ICIs in the perioperative setting of HNSCC. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Outcomes of interest included safety, pathological response, event-free or disease-free survival (EFS/DFS), and overall survival (OS). Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneous study designs.Twenty-five studies (18 published, 7 conference abstracts) met inclusion criteria. Neoadjuvant ICI monotherapy was safe but showed modest major pathological response (MPR) rates (~ 6%). Combination strategies were more effective: the IMCISION trial reported 35% MPR with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. 17% with nivolumab alone. Neoadjuvant therapy did not delay surgery. In the adjuvant setting, the NIVOPOSTOP trial showed improved 3-year DFS with nivolumab plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy (63.1% vs. 52.5%). The KEYNOTE-689 trial showed perioperative pembrolizumab significantly improved EFS (51.8 vs. 30.4 months), leading to FDA approval in PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 tumors.Pathologic response correlated with improved survival. Ongoing trials are refining biomarkers, combinations, and sequencing. Perioperative immunotherapy is reshaping curative-intent management of HNSCC, establishing a new multidisciplinary treatment paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.