Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42363126›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Evaluating a novel online acute oncology education and competence assessment passport in the UK.

Gina Madera, Donna Munro, Leigh Hamilton, Helen Davies, Lorraine Petrie, Verna Lavender

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gina MaderaThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. gina.madera@nhs.net.
Donna MunroRoyal College of Nursing, London, United Kingdom.
Leigh HamiltonMacmillan Cancer Support, London, United Kingdom.
Helen DaviesMacmillan Cancer Support, London, United Kingdom.
Lorraine PetrieNursing and Midwifery Council, London, UK.
Verna LavenderGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

NHS England Workforce, Training and Education (formerly Health Education England) 20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute oncology e-learning for staff who treat and care for people with cancer in the United Kingdom exists; however standardised, acute oncology competence assessment does not. This study reports the development and evaluation of a standardised acute oncology competence assessment integrated within an existing e-learning resource, which ultimately aims to improve cancer patient safety outcomes across the UK. The e-learning and assessment were developed for multidisciplinary staff working in any clinical setting where patients with cancer may present with urgent or emergency symptoms. For example, acute medical units, accident and emergency, same day emergency care, primary care and pre-hospital settings, such as paramedic services and general practice, as well an introductory resource for staff new to working in oncology.

methodsIn Phase 1, the study team multidisciplinary professionals and cancer-specialist educators from across the UK co-designed a Digital Competence Assessment for 'practice Level 1'. An existing 'Introduction to Acute Oncology E-learning Module' was revised to include the novel Digital Competence Assessment (together the e-learning and competence assessment were termed: The Level 1 Acute Oncology Passport). This was piloted and evaluated across the UK during Phase 2. Quantitative data from pre (n = 376) and post (n = 176) Level 1 Acute Oncology Passport responses were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Free-text responses were analysed using content analysis.

resultsThere was a significant increase in learners' level of confidence about their acute oncology knowledge and skills pre and post e-learning and digital competence assessment. The Level 1 Acute Oncology Passport was evaluated as relevant, pitched at the correct level and an appropriate measure for assessing acute oncology knowledge and skills competencies. The main challenge reported was lack of study time. There was also a desire for support of acute oncology knowledge and skills development in the workplace, alongside or following e-learning.

conclusionsAcute oncology is an important area of practice for improving outcomes for people with cancer, but for acute oncology to be effective it requires a knowledgeable and skilled workforce. The acute oncology learning needs of staff caring for people with cancer in other countries are likely to be similar to the UK. Although respondents were staff who opted to complete the online learning, assessment and evaluation survey, our e-learning and digital assessment of competence Passport was found to be engaging, relevant and acceptable, demonstrating the value of co-design. It also increased learners' confidence and knowledge about acute oncology. However, dedicated time and support are needed for healthcare staff to develop knowledge and skills to ensure safe outcomes for people with cancer. We suggest that similar education and competence assessment resources are needed to address acute oncology learning needs among the broader cancer care workforce.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceComputer-Assisted InstructionEducational MeasurementEducation, DistanceMedical OncologyHumansInternetUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID42363126
PMCPMC13602533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.