ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Ethical issues in caring for older persons in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapid population ageing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is unfolding within fragile health systems, weak social protection, and limited geriatric and palliative services, creating ethical challenges in older adult care. This study critically reviews current literature and policy reports, synthesizes key themes, and proposes evidence-based recommendations for policy, practice, and research.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and reported following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A comprehensive search of biomedical, ethics, social science, and grey literature databases was undertaken to identify studies published between 2000 and 2025 on ethical issues in the care of older adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. Eligible English-language sources were screened by predefined inclusion criteria, and data were charted and synthesized thematically to map key ethical issues, concepts, and evidence gaps.
resultsWe identified multiple ethical challenges that affect older adult care in SSA, including justice, equity, autonomy, dignity, vulnerability, abuse, and ageism. Healthcare-related concerns involve unmet needs, resource allocation dilemmas, limited palliative and end-of-life care, and age-biased clinical decisions. Socially, weakening family support systems create moral tensions for caregivers. Policy analyses emphasise rights-based, culturally sensitive, and equitable approaches, highlighting the need for integrated ethical, social, and systemic care strategies.
conclusionsAddressing ethical issues in older care in SSA requires legally enshrined protections, health-system investments, public campaigns to counter ageism, supportive decision-making frameworks that respect cultural contexts and individual rights and strengthened research and surveillance. A right-based, culturally sensitive approach focused on the voices of older persons is essential. REGISTRATION: The protocol for this scoping review was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9AXVW .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.