ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Chinese couples' lived experiences and decision-making on pregnancy continuation following prenatal anomaly detection: phenomenological and theory of planned behaviour insights.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPrenatal detection of fetal anomalies creates significant emotional and decision-making challenges for expectant parents. International research has described shock, uncertainty, and distress following diagnosis, yet little is known about how such experiences unfold within Chinese cultural and family contexts. Family authority, lineage expectations, and concerns about stigma may shape how parents interpret the diagnosis and negotiate reproductive choices. Evidence remains limited regarding how Chinese couples experience emotional disruption, navigate family involvement, and make sense of the diagnosis during a period marked by uncertainty and moral pressure. This study sought to address this gap by exploring the lived experiences of Chinese couples following detection of a suspected or confirmed fetal anomaly.
methodThe qualitative phenomenological study employed Moustakas' transcendental phenomenology(TP) and Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior(TPB). Conducted in Suzhou City, situated in the Yangtze River Delta region of Eastern China, the research spanned from November 21, 2024, to February 15, 2025. The participants were 30 couples who had experienced prenatal anomaly detection in the past 12 months.
resultsAnalysis identified five themes that described how couples experienced emotional rupture, cultural pressure, and relational strain after receiving a prenatal anomaly diagnosis. Parents reported an abrupt loss of their anticipated future, marked by shock, temporal disruption, and efforts to regain a sense of control. Decision-making occurred within a landscape shaped by moral tension, clinical uncertainty, and unequal options. Cultural expectations related to filial piety, lineage, and family reputation influenced how parents interpreted the diagnosis and negotiated reproductive choices. Family and clinical support played complex roles by offering stability for some and creating additional pressure for others. The diagnosis also reshaped couple relationships, strengthening some bonds while exposing significant strain in others.
conclusionsChinese couples experiencing potential fetal congenital anomalies undergo intense emotions and employ various coping strategies. Their decisions are influenced by medical advice, cultural influences, and the availability of resources. By integrating the TP and TPB, this study examines their experiences and decision-making processes, emphasizing the need for culturally tailored support and counseling that respects their emotional and cultural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42363067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.