ArticleBMC genomics2026
Genomic distribution characteristics and interspecific differences of microsatellite landscapes in Felidae.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicrosatellites within genomes play crucial roles in regulating gene expression, DNA replication, and chromosomal structure and function. Analyzing the composition and distribution patterns of microsatellites in closely related species not only reveals their evolutionary dynamics and adaptive mechanisms but also provides essential technical support for applications in genetic breeding, species conservation, and disease research. As one of the world's most captivating animal groups, the landscape patterns of microsatellites across feline genomes remain to be systematically characterized.
resultsThis study utilized high-quality genomic data to conduct a systematic comparative analysis of microsatellite landscape distribution patterns across the genomes of 13 felid species. The findings revealed that microsatellite abundance and distribution exhibit species-specific characteristics, with a non-random genomic distribution and a negative correlation between microsatellite abundance and repeat length. The predominant distribution pattern followed the sequence: single > double > quadruple > triple > quintuple > sextuple nucleotide repeats. Microsatellite abundance peaked in intergenic regions, whereas trinucleotide repeats were more prevalent within exons. Coding regions showed a marked preference for trinucleotide and hexanucleotide repeats. Enrichment analysis of GO and KEGG pathways indicated that coding sequences containing microsatellites were primarily involved in transcription and translation processes.
conclusionsOur study elucidates the distribution patterns and characteristics of microsatellites across diverse feline species, providing significant insights into their evolutionary mechanisms and functional roles. Furthermore, these findings establish a valuable reference and foundational dataset for the future development of high-quality, species-specific microsatellite markers in felids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.