Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42362947›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Minimally invasive surgery for insertional Achilles tendinopathy : Do Haglund resection, refixation of the Achilles tendon and Zadek osteotomy also work using minimally invasive techniques?]

Matthias Lerch

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthias LerchKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Krankenhaus Wittmund gGmbH, Dohuser Weg 10, 26409, Wittmund, Deutschland. matthias.lerch@kh-wtm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT), with or without an associated Haglund deformity, represents one of the most common causes of posterior heel pain. Although open surgical procedures provide reliable clinical outcomes, they are associated with prolonged rehabilitation periods and higher complication rates. In recent years, endoscopic and percutaneous techniques have emerged as safe and effective alternatives and should now be considered integral components of the surgical treatment spectrum. THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS: In patients with an isolated Haglund deformity without signs of IAT, percutaneous resection of the Haglund prominence represents an appropriate treatment option. Endoscopic calcaneoplasty is particularly indicated in the presence of a Haglund deformity associated with only mild IAT. In cases of pronounced calcification at the Achilles tendon insertion-irrespective of the presence of a concomitant Haglund deformity-percutaneous Zadek osteotomy offers an effective therapeutic alternative. This procedure allows for significant pain reduction and meaningful functional improvement while maintaining a low complication rate. CHOICE: The choice of surgical technique should be individualized, taking into account the underlying pathology, the extent of Achilles tendon involvement, and patient-specific functional demands.

Indexed as

Achilles tendonCalcaneusEndoscopyHeelPain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.