ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
The Magnet-Actuated Craniofacial (MAC) Distraction System: Magnetic Coupling Modeling.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCraniofacial distraction osteogenesis (DO) has proven clinical effectiveness in the management of syndromic craniosynostosis and other complex craniofacial abnormalities. However, current craniofacial distraction systems rely on external activation ports which, in turn, increase the risk of infection, mechanical failure, premature removal of the distraction system and significant sociopsychological burden. To address these problems, we developed the Magnet-Actuated Craniofacial (MAC) distraction system, a fully-internalized distraction system to eliminate the need for external activation ports.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive three-dimensional magnetostatic finite element modeling (FEM) framework to optimize the magnetic coupling efficiency of the MAC distraction system. Magnetic coupling configurations included a traditional coaxial dipole coupling and a redesigned U-shaped, flux-guided magnetic circuit incorporating high-energy neodymium magnets and a ferromagnetic shunt plate. Parametric analyses quantified torque-angle behavior, torsional stiffness, and axial forces over variable air domains (separation distances) up to 11.5 mm.
resultsThe coaxial dipole configuration exhibited steep torque and force decay with increasing air domain, limiting reliable actuation and torque transmission across variable, clinically relevant soft-tissue thicknesses. In contrast, the U-shaped, flux-guided architecture enforced a dominant magnetic return path, yielding up to a six-fold increase in peak torque and over a five-fold improvement in torsional stiffness at small air domains, while maintaining clinically relevant transmissible torque and attractive forces even at larger air domains.
conclusionMagnetic actuation limitations are not intrinsic but design-dependent. Flux-guided magnetic circuit engineering enabled robust, precise, predictable, and anatomy-tolerant transdermal torque transmission, supporting the feasibility of a fully-internalized, magnetically-actuated craniofacial distraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42362931What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.