ArticleNature neuroscience2026
Conditioned accumbal dopamine transients forecast individual preference for drug versus natural rewards and compulsive behavior.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conditioned accumbal dopamine transients forecast individual preference for drug versus natural rewards and compulsive behavior.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addicted individuals prefer drug rewards over natural rewards. Dysregulated dopamine (DA) signaling in the nucleus accumbens is thought to trigger this phenomenon, but there is little supporting evidence. Using a genetically encoded sensor, we monitored DA dynamics in mice in an operant associative task with natural (fat solution) or artificial (cocaine or optogenetic DA self-stimulation) rewards. During learning, DA transients emerged at predictive cues for both reward types, vanished at natural reward delivery, but persisted at artificial reward delivery. In choice sessions, animals' preferences varied from exclusive natural reward to exclusive artificial reward. Individual preferences were predicted by cue-evoked DA response magnitudes. Revaluation of reward contingencies shifted reward-type preference and DA signaling accordingly, but not in mice showing compulsive drug seeking, indicating impaired value updating in these mice. These results support a model in which DA drives adaptive reward seeking, with persistent cue-associated DA signaling underpinning addiction vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.