Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42362851›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Cognitive mechanism of creative thinking: Integrating the semantic network and spreading activation model.

Jing Chen, Jialin Hou, Yifei Cao, Benjamin Katz, Lin Yang, Cheng Liu, Xueyang Wang, Li He, Ruizhi He, Qunlin Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jing ChenSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Jialin HouSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Yifei CaoZurich Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich & ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Benjamin KatzDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Lin YangSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Cheng LiuSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Xueyang WangSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Li HeSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Ruizhi HeSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Qunlin ChenSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China. chenqunlin@swu.edu.cn.
Jiang QiuSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China. qiuj318@swu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational modeling offers a principled way to link the structure of semantic networks to the processes that support creative problem solving. We combined item-level semantic network analyses (Experiment 1, behavioral method) with the Spreading Activation Model simulation (SAM; Experiment 2, computational modeling) for the Chinese Word Remote Associates Test (CWRAT). In Experiment 1, we built customized item-semantic networks based on the CWRAT-free association task and quantified network properties for each item. Results showed that greater network efficiency and higher modularity were associated with higher item pass rates, whereas larger network size was associated with lower item pass rates. In Experiment 2, we used SAM to simulate activation dynamics on each item's semantic network across a grid of retention (r, the proportion of activation retained at each time step) and decay (d, the proportion of activation lost at each time step) parameters. At the item level, we extracted target-activation metrics (mean maximum activation, mean activation, and mean activation retention duration), and the results showed that these metrics correlated positively with the empirical item pass rate and negatively with item response time. At the individual level, we estimated best-fitting parameter pairs (r, d) for each participant. Results showed that these parameters correlated negatively with individuals' performance in both full and high-difficulty item sets. Particularly on the high-difficulty subset, results showed that parameters correlated positively with individual ratings of insightfulness and interest. Together, these results describe how bottom-up spreading activation may interact with top-down control to shape and support the creative thinking process.

Indexed as

CognitionCreativityModels, PsychologicalSemanticsThinkingComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleProblem SolvingCreative processCreativityRemote associates testSemantic networkSpreading activation model

Identifiers

PMID42362851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.