ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Cognitive mechanism of creative thinking: Integrating the semantic network and spreading activation model.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational modeling offers a principled way to link the structure of semantic networks to the processes that support creative problem solving. We combined item-level semantic network analyses (Experiment 1, behavioral method) with the Spreading Activation Model simulation (SAM; Experiment 2, computational modeling) for the Chinese Word Remote Associates Test (CWRAT). In Experiment 1, we built customized item-semantic networks based on the CWRAT-free association task and quantified network properties for each item. Results showed that greater network efficiency and higher modularity were associated with higher item pass rates, whereas larger network size was associated with lower item pass rates. In Experiment 2, we used SAM to simulate activation dynamics on each item's semantic network across a grid of retention (r, the proportion of activation retained at each time step) and decay (d, the proportion of activation lost at each time step) parameters. At the item level, we extracted target-activation metrics (mean maximum activation, mean activation, and mean activation retention duration), and the results showed that these metrics correlated positively with the empirical item pass rate and negatively with item response time. At the individual level, we estimated best-fitting parameter pairs (r, d) for each participant. Results showed that these parameters correlated negatively with individuals' performance in both full and high-difficulty item sets. Particularly on the high-difficulty subset, results showed that parameters correlated positively with individual ratings of insightfulness and interest. Together, these results describe how bottom-up spreading activation may interact with top-down control to shape and support the creative thinking process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42362851What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.