ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Neuropathophysiological changes associated with mirtazapine treatment response in major depressive disorder: insights into bottom-up dopaminergic pathways and prefrontal control networks.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) shows striking heterogeneity in both symptoms and underlying pathophysiology, and the absence of biologically grounded subtypes often results in a prolonged trial-and-error process when selecting effective treatments. This has motivated efforts to identify biomarkers that may predict individual treatment responses. Although mirtazapine is widely used and its efficacy is well established in clinical settings, neuroscientific studies on its treatment response remain limited relative to other antidepressants. To address this gap, this study examined pre-treatment pathophysiological neural features associated with subsequent response to mirtazapine. Sixty-seven individuals with MDD underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a conditioned reward task and then received monotherapy with mirtazapine or one of two comparator antidepressants (agomelatine or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor). Mirtazapine responders demonstrated increased pre-treatment activation in core components of the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway, particularly the ventral tegmental area and ventral striatum, as well as in prefrontal and functionally connected regions implicated in reward evaluation, reward-related behavioral inhibition, and reward-based decision-making. Importantly, many of these response-related activations were specific to the mirtazapine group. These findings suggest that altered engagement of mesolimbic dopaminergic pathways and prefrontal regulatory networks during reward processing may characterize an MDD subtype responsive to mirtazapine, and that such patterns may serve as biomarkers for identifying patients likely to benefit from this treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42362819What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.