Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42362819›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026

Neuropathophysiological changes associated with mirtazapine treatment response in major depressive disorder: insights into bottom-up dopaminergic pathways and prefrontal control networks.

Younghwa Lee, Egle Simulionyte, Sandi Hebib, André Manook, Rosanne Picotin, Somayeh Mohammadi Jooyandeh, Thomas C Baghai, Jens Schwarzbach, Rainer Rupprecht, Oliver Gruber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Younghwa LeeSection for Experimental Psychopathology and Neuroimaging, Department of General Psychiatry, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Egle SimulionyteSection for Experimental Psychopathology and Neuroimaging, Department of General Psychiatry, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sandi HebibSection for Experimental Psychopathology and Neuroimaging, Department of General Psychiatry, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
André ManookDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Rosanne PicotinSection for Experimental Psychopathology and Neuroimaging, Department of General Psychiatry, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Somayeh Mohammadi JooyandehDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Thomas C BaghaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Jens SchwarzbachDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Rainer RupprechtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Oliver GruberSection for Experimental Psychopathology and Neuroimaging, Department of General Psychiatry, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. Oliver.Gruber@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01EE1401BGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01EE1401EGerman Research Foundation (DFG) INST 35/1597-1 FUGGMinistry of Science, Research, and Arts Baden- Württemberg (MWK) and German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 35/1314-1 FUGGState of Baden-Württemberg bwHPC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) shows striking heterogeneity in both symptoms and underlying pathophysiology, and the absence of biologically grounded subtypes often results in a prolonged trial-and-error process when selecting effective treatments. This has motivated efforts to identify biomarkers that may predict individual treatment responses. Although mirtazapine is widely used and its efficacy is well established in clinical settings, neuroscientific studies on its treatment response remain limited relative to other antidepressants. To address this gap, this study examined pre-treatment pathophysiological neural features associated with subsequent response to mirtazapine. Sixty-seven individuals with MDD underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a conditioned reward task and then received monotherapy with mirtazapine or one of two comparator antidepressants (agomelatine or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor). Mirtazapine responders demonstrated increased pre-treatment activation in core components of the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway, particularly the ventral tegmental area and ventral striatum, as well as in prefrontal and functionally connected regions implicated in reward evaluation, reward-related behavioral inhibition, and reward-based decision-making. Importantly, many of these response-related activations were specific to the mirtazapine group. These findings suggest that altered engagement of mesolimbic dopaminergic pathways and prefrontal regulatory networks during reward processing may characterize an MDD subtype responsive to mirtazapine, and that such patterns may serve as biomarkers for identifying patients likely to benefit from this treatment.

Indexed as

Antidepressive Agents, TricyclicMajor Depressive DisorderMirtazapinePrefrontal CortexVentral Tegmental AreaAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMianserinMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysRewardTreatment Effect HeterogeneityAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicMianserinMirtazapineBiomarkersMajor depressive disorderMirtazapinePrefrontal cortexVentral striatumVentral tegmental area

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.