ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Psychosocial outcomes of reproductive genetic carrier screening up to five years post-result.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The long-term psychosocial outcomes of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) have yet to be adequately quantified. We examined long-term psychosocial outcomes of RGCS within the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project ('Mackenzie's Mission'), where 9107 reproductive couples had RGCS for ~1300 genes and 175 (1.9%) received a new increased chance result. We administered a survey at approximately three to five years (mean = 3.7) post-result, capturing attitudes toward the result, state anxiety (using the STAI-6) and decision regret for all participants, plus empowerment and decisional conflict for participants with an increased chance result. Using STAI-6 data from previous surveys, we used linear mixed models to examine change in state anxiety over time. Participants with a low chance result (n = 2512) had low state anxiety, minimal decision regret and felt reassured by their result. For participants with an increased chance result (n = 86), increased state anxiety after result disclosure gradually decreased, almost returning to baseline by 3-5 years post-result. This group also had high empowerment, minimal decision regret, low decisional conflict regarding reproductive choices and positive attitudes about the utility of their increased chance result. Predictors of clinically meaningful state anxiety at 3-5 years post-result were: having an increased chance result, higher trait anxiety and having a child with a medical condition/disability. Findings highlight that large-panel RGCS is valuable for reproductive planning. Elevated state anxiety after increased chance result disclosure aligns with other reproductive genetic screening and decreases over time. It is important that RGCS programmes provide appropriate, longitudinal psychosocial support to promote the reproductive empowerment of all who participate.
Identifiers
42362799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.