Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42362716›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2026

Reassessing BMI thresholds for obesity: a population-based study in Turkish adults.

Semiha Zeynep Özsaydı, Hasan Durmuş, Leyla Tekdemir, Seçkin Özsaydı, Arda Borlu, Neslihan Öner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Semiha Zeynep ÖzsaydıHealth Directorate of Kayseri, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0065-9633
Hasan DurmuşDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey. hasandurmus@erciyes.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-1475
Leyla TekdemirHealth Directorate of Kayseri, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-4237
Seçkin ÖzsaydıHealth Directorate of Kayseri, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8350-288X
Arda BorluDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1424-8037
Neslihan ÖnerErciyes University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-4963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global prevalence of obesity has been steadily increasing, posing major public health challenges. Current universal BMI cut-off points may not accurately reflect obesity risk across different ethnicities, including the Turkish population.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage (BF%) and determine appropriate BMI cut-off points for diagnosing obesity in Turkish adults.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among Turkish individuals aged 18-65 in four major districts of Kayseri. Anthropometric measurements were obtained, including height, weight, waist circumference, and hip circumference. Body composition was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve analysis was performed to identify optimal BMI cut-off points for predicting obesity based on BF%. Pearson correlation analysis evaluated the relationship between BMI and BF%.

resultsThe participants had a mean age of 39.9 ± 13.3 years, and 51.6% were female. A strong positive correlation between BMI and BF% was found for both women (r = 0.86, p < 0.001) and men (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). The optimal BMI cut-off point for detecting obesity was 28.76 kg/m² for the total sample, 28.80 kg/m² for women, and 28.76 kg/m² for men. Using these new thresholds, the obesity prevalence increased from 27.7% to 33.6%. The AUC values indicated excellent discriminative power for women (AUC = 0.98) and good discriminative power for men (AUC = 0.91).

conclusionThe current universal BMI cut-off points (≥30 kg/m²) may underestimate obesity prevalence in the Turkish population. Establishing national and gender-specific BMI thresholds could improve the accuracy of obesity diagnosis and support more effective public health interventions targeting chronic non-communicable diseases.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexObesityAdolescentAdultAgedBody CompositionCross-Sectional StudiesElectric ImpedanceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceReference ValuesROC CurveTurkey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.