ArticleNature communications2026
Affinity- and epitope-dependent pathogenicity of GM-CSF autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP) is a rare lung disease caused by autoantibodies targeting granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Although serum GM-CSF autoantibody levels are markedly increased in aPAP patients, total antibody titer does not correlate with disease severity. Here, we characterize 186 monoclonal anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies derived from GM-CSF-specific B cells in 28 aPAP patients with varying disease severity, including three longitudinal cohorts, to determine whether epitope specificity and affinity of the autoantibodies contribute to disease pathophysiology. We classify these antibodies into two groups based on their epitopes: class 1 (targeting A, BD, or D epitopes) and class 2 (targeting B or C epitopes). In class 1 antibodies, affinity strongly correlates with neutralization activity, whereas this relationship is weak or absent in class 2 antibodies. High-affinity class 1 antibodies are present at higher levels in patients with more severe disease and are sufficient to induce PAP symptoms in a humanized mouse model. Thus, these findings identify epitope specificity and affinity as key determinants of pathogenicity and provide a mechanistic framework for understanding why total serum autoantibody levels fail to reflect disease severity in aPAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.