ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2026
Anti-TNF immunogenicity in a Middle Eastern inflammatory bowel disease cohort: prevalence, predictors and context-specific drug level thresholds.
Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAnti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) immunogenicity remains a major barrier to treatment persistence in inflammatory bowel disease, yet data from Middle Eastern populations are lacking. We characterised immunogenicity rates, predictors and loss of response mechanisms in a real-world cohort.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 314 anti-TNF treatment courses (212 infliximab, 102 adalimumab) in 248 patients at a tertiary centre in the United Arab Emirates. Immunogenicity was defined by detectable anti-drug antibodies on a drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay with acid dissociation. Drug levels, predictors and loss of response mechanisms were analysed.
resultsImmunogenicity developed in 28.3% (89/314) of courses over median follow-up of 24.0 months (median time to detection 15.0 months, IQR 8.0-36.0). Infliximab and adalimumab had comparable rates (26.9% vs 31.4%; p=0.425). Immunogenicity-mediated failure was the leading cause of discontinuation (48.4%). Pre-event trough levels were significantly lower in immunogenic courses (median 3.0 vs 14.0 mcg/mL; p<0.001). Exploratory receiver operating characteristic thresholds of 5.3 mcg/mL for infliximab (area under the curve (AUC) 0.880) and 6.4 mcg/mL for adalimumab (AUC 0.861) predicted immunogenicity with high discrimination. On shared frailty Cox regression, prior surgery was the strongest predictor (HR 1.85, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.64; p=0.074). A sensitivity analysis excluding rescued patients strengthened the surgery signal (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.41 to 5.56; p=0.003). Subcutaneous infliximab showed lower immunogenicity than intravenous infliximab (new starters 1/25 (4.0%), switchers 1/33 (3.0%) vs IV 57/212 (26.9%)); after propensity score matching on five covariates, the difference remained significant (3.8% vs 18.3%; p=0.013), though a new starters-only analysis did not reach significance (p=0.062).
conclusionImmunogenicity patterns in this Middle Eastern cohort are consistent with Western data, supporting pharmacokinetic rather than population-specific determinants. These findings suggest a potential benefit of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring and that subcutaneous infliximab may offer an immunogenic advantage warranting prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.