ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Evaluating Client-Centered Counseling Approaches to Improve Contraceptive Uptake at Family Planning Centers in Rawalpindi, Pakistan: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster-Randomized Trial.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite active national initiatives, the low prevalence of modern contraception in Pakistan remains unchanged, leading to high rates of unintended pregnancies and poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Conventional directive counseling does not sufficiently cater to women's needs, whereas structured client-centered strategies like GATHER (greet, ask, tell, help, explain, return) and the balanced counseling strategy (BCS) may improve outcomes. Existing literature assessing the comparative effectiveness of these strategies in the Pakistani population lacks evidence. Objective: The study aim is to compare the effectiveness of routine counseling, GATHER, and the BCS in improving client satisfaction with, and uptake of, modern contraceptives. Methods: This is a pilot, 3-arm, single-blinded, parallel, cluster-randomized trial conducted in tertiary care hospital-affiliated family health centers in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. It is a 3-phased trial, first assessing baseline data on contraceptive uptake and discontinuation determinants among 333 women of reproductive age. The second phase will provide structured training to service providers based on either GATHER or the BCS in each arm. After training, assessments will be performed at 3- and 6-month intervals to evaluate contraceptive uptake and counseling quality improvements. In the last phase, a qualitative analysis will be done through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews to identify barriers to implementation and to assess scalability. Analyses will be done using SPSS (version 26; IBM Corp). Analyses of quantitative and qualitative data will be done using mixed effects models and thematic analysis, accounting for clustering, to evaluate the interventions' effects on contraceptive uptake and client satisfaction. Results: Delivery of the intervention is underway, and baseline data from the 333 participants have been collected. The first follow-up assessments are planned at intervals of 3 and 6 months. However, no outcome data have been obtained or analyses performed at this stage. Conclusions: This pilot trial is expected to generate evidence on the effectiveness of structured, client-centered counseling strategies in comparison to conventional routine practices, showing improved uptake of contraceptive use and satisfaction in Pakistan. The findings are expected to facilitate the design of comprehensive and scaled-up trials and guide national family planning programs and the integration of rights-based counseling strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.