ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Genomes of Conopholis americana and Epifagus virginiana: two holoparasitic plants (Orobanchaceae).
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conopholis americana (American cancer-root) and Epifagus virginiana (beechdrops) are sister genera of holoparasitic plants (Orobanchaceae) native to eastern North America, parasitizing oaks and American beech, respectively. Both have served as models for plastid genome reduction, yet no nuclear genomes exist for either genus or any New World holoparasitic Orobanchaceae. Here we present the first nuclear genome assemblies for both species using PacBio HiFi sequencing. The C. americana assembly totals 1.82 Gb and E. virginiana totals 440 Mb, representing an approximately 4-fold difference in genome size between these sister genera. We observed a BUSCO completeness of 79% to 80% in both species, which is typical of holoparasites. While gene prediction identified 33,889 genes in C. americana and 21,031 in E. virginiana, repeat annotation revealed that LTR retrotransposons account for 78% of the genome size difference. These assemblies reveal contrasting mechanisms of genome evolution in sister holoparasitic genera and provide foundational resources for comparative genomics of parasitic plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.