ArticleJCO oncology practice2026
Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients With Use of Vaginal Estrogen Therapy: A SEER Analysis.
Article in JCO oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAntihormonal therapy, including tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors, is central to the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. A common adverse effect is genitourinary syndrome of menopause, which may be treated with vaginal estrogen. However, the safety of vaginal estrogen in breast cancer survivors remains controversial, leading to inconsistent clinical guidance and potential underuse.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 25,874 female patients with breast cancer age 65 years and older diagnosed between 2007 and 2017 using the SEER-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) registry. Patients who used vaginal estrogen after diagnosis (n = 1,053) were compared with nonusers (n = 24,821). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models evaluated associations with overall and cause-specific mortality, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and oncologic factors. A secondary analysis modeled vaginal estrogen use as a time-dependent covariate.
resultsVaginal estrogen use was associated with decreased overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.49;
conclusionVaginal estrogen use was not associated with worse overall survival or breast cancer-specific survival in this cohort SEER-MHOS cohort of patients older than 65 years. Loss of significance in time-dependent models suggests that initial associations may reflect immortal time or selection bias. These findings support growing evidence that local vaginal estrogen is not associated with adverse survival outcomes and may be considered for symptom management in appropriately selected patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.