Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42361210›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Large Language Models in Health Care Communication: Scoping Review.

Jing Chang, Ruotong Peng, Xi Chen, Yishu Zhu, Ruting Miao, Zeng Cao, Hui Feng

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jing Chang *Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2520-1992
Ruotong Peng *School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-4853
Xi ChenXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-5104
Yishu ZhuXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1057-9076
Ruting MiaoSchool of Nursing, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5459-8290
Zeng Cao *Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0223-522X
Hui Feng *Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Changsha, 410083, China, 1 073182650297.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-4780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective health care communication is crucial in the medical field. However, effective communication in clinical practice still faces numerous obstacles, and large language models (LLMs) offer various possibilities for improving the quality of medical communication. To date, there are no published reviews on the use of LLMs in health care communication. Objective: This review sought to summarize the applications and challenges of LLMs in health care communication and to identify directions for future research. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 2018 to November 2025. The search and selection process followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guideline and the PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search extension) checklist. Eligible studies used LLMs to facilitate health care communication among the public, patients, and clinicians. Following rigorous data extraction and cross-checking, we conducted a quantitative analysis of characteristics of the included literature. Furthermore, using communication accommodation theory as a framework, we identified application patterns of LLMs in health care communication and summarized current challenges and future directions. Results: Ninety-six studies were included in this review, all published between 2023 and 2025, summarizing 4 patterns of LLM application in health care communication: transforming medical information (n=30), facilitating dynamic interaction (n=38), empowering communication capabilities (n=10), and optimizing clinical workflows (n=18). The role of LLMs in health care communication is undergoing a paradigm shift from "static information processing" to "dynamic intelligent interaction." Although they show great promise for practical applications, current evaluation methods and dimensions exhibit significant heterogeneity. Furthermore, LLMs still face multiple challenges in their practical application in health care communication, including technical reliability issues, social trust and adoption, interaction and access barriers, and clinical integration challenges. Conclusions: Unlike previous studies that merely touched upon the challenges and future directions, this scoping review uses communication accommodation theory to systematically map the application patterns and developmental landscape of LLM-mediated health care communication. Health care communication powered by LLMs holds significant innovation potential and is currently still in the early stages of rapid development. Future research should focus on optimizing model performance, strengthening ethical governance frameworks, enhancing human-machine collaboration models, and ensuring responsible application of LLMs in health care through rigorous empirical validation.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationLarge Language ModelsDelivery of Health CareHumanscommunication accommodation theorydigital healthhealth care communicationlarge language modelsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42361210
PMCPMC13308756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.