ArticlePloS one2026
Mental health of healthcare workers in England during the first three years of the COVID-19 pandemic: The NHS CHECK study cohort.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaintaining healthcare workers' (HCWs) mental health is vital to reduce staff absences and turnover, ultimately improving patient care. Most research focuses on clinical staff and single timepoints, overlooking non-clinical contributions.
aimsTo examine mental health variations among all staff types over three years and identify those most at risk of poor mental health outcomes.
methodsOur prospective cohort study followed 22,092 HCWs from 17 English NHS Trusts. Online surveys assessed common mental disorders (CMDs), depression, anxiety, alcohol misuse, PTSD, moral injury, burnout, wellbeing, resilience, and post-traumatic growth at four timepoints from April 2020 to March 2023. Data were analysed cross-sectionally and weighted to represent Trust demographics.
resultsApproximately 50% of participants reported probable CMDs at all timepoints. The most consistent predictor of poor mental health was having met the baseline cut-off for that outcome. No consistent differences emerged between clinical and non-clinical staff. Younger, female, lower-paid staff, those feeling unsupported by colleagues/managers, and exposed to morally injurious events were most at risk of poor mental health outcomes.
conclusionsAll NHS staff types face persistent mental health struggles, with no significant improvement post-pandemic restrictions. Structural inequalities must be addressed long-term, alongside targeted, flexible support for staff in the short term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.