Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42361196›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Single-threshold-guided adaptive cancer therapy with partial-cycle treatment: A mechanistic and reinforcement learning analysis.

Kexin Ma, Ningjing Wang, Zai Yang, Robert A Cheke, Biao Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kexin MaSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Ningjing WangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Zai YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Robert A ChekeNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich at Medway, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7437-1934
Biao TangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0418-5773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive cancer therapy seeks to modulate aggressive treatment to preserve drug-sensitive tumor cells that suppress resistant populations, but existing strategies often rely on frequent treatment decisions enabled by intensive surveillance, limiting clinical feasibility. Here, we propose a clinically motivated alternative that shortens the treatment window within a fixed and relatively long surveillance cycle, thereby avoiding the need for frequent monitoring. Based on this idea, we develop a mechanistic modeling framework for single-threshold-guided adaptive therapy with partial surveillance-cycle treatment (AT-PSC) and benchmark its performance using reinforcement learning. Using clinically calibrated parameters from an individual patient, simulations show that AT-PSC prolongs the time to progression (TTP) by 402 days compared with adaptive therapy using full surveillance-cycle treatment, while substantially reducing treatment exposure (dose reduced by 10.1%). Consequently, AT-PSC achieves significantly larger TTP gains than continuous therapy (1891 days) and two-threshold-guided adaptive therapy AT50 (1123 days). Simulations using data from six additional patients and sensitivity analyses further demonstrate that these benefits are robust across heterogeneous tumor growth profiles, while individual-based treatment should be considered to maximize TTP. Reinforcement learning yields comparable outcomes under the same fixed treatment window and can further extend TTP when the treatment window is adaptively adjusted. Together, these results support AT-PSC as a clinically feasible strategy to improve disease control while reducing treatment burden, and suggest that a practical regimen, such as a 14-day treatment window within a 30-day surveillance cycle, can provide sustained benefits for a broad patient population.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeoplasmsAdaptive AlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansReinforcement Machine LearningAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID42361196
PMCPMC13336478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.