ArticleScience advances2026
Hydrostatic pressure reduces the mechanosensitivity of cell migration.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cells sense and respond to diverse physical cues as they migrate toward distant sites. While much is known about the roles of cellular molecules in the regulation of mechanosensitivity, our understanding of how extracellular cues influence this property remains limited. Here, we show that prolonged exposure to elevated, yet (patho)physiologically relevant, extracellular hydrostatic pressure decreases migration sensitivity to substrate stiffness, fluid viscosity, fluid forces, and hydraulic resistance. Reduced mechanosensitivity can persist for days after the high-pressure cue is removed, indicating that cells retain a memory of hydrostatic pressure. Mechanistically, high pressure down-regulates the Rho/MRTF/SRF pathway, activating a myosin II-independent mechanosensing mechanism that shifts the maximum cell speed toward stiffer substrates, as predicted mathematically and demonstrated experimentally. Stiffer substrates increase migration of preconditioned cells by strengthening focal adhesions and redistributing them to the cell periphery to support Arp2/3-dependent lamellipodia extension. Collectively, hydrostatic pressure reprograms the mechanosensing machinery to drive lasting effects on cell mechanosensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.