ArticlePloS one2026
Further evidence for embodied cognition: The link between spontaneous respiratory oscillations and number processing.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embodied accounts of cognition propose that bodily states shape mental representations. We test this proposal in numerical cognition by asking whether spontaneous respiration biases random number generation (RNG). Building on prior work by Belli and collaborators (2021), we adopt a self-paced handwriting RNG paradigm that preserves the continuous, cyclic nature of breathing. Healthy adults will write digits 1-9 on a tablet while abdominal respiration is recorded via a piezoelectric belt. For each trial, we will extract the breathing phase (inhalation/exhalation) and the abdominal expansion at that moment. We preregister three hypotheses: (Hp1) inhalation will bias production toward larger numbers relative to exhalation; (Hp2) greater abdominal expansion will predict larger numbers independent of phase; and (Hp3) inhalation and larger expansion will be associated with increased written-digit size. The predefined sample size (N = 30) will provide 99.9% power to detect effects on the order reported by prior work. By coupling fine-grained respiratory dynamics with self-paced behavior, the study offers a stringent test of whether interoceptive and somatosensory signals couple with abstract magnitude processing. Confirmatory evidence would provide convergent, method-robust support for embodied influences on numerical cognition and will reveal a parallel impact on action, strengthening brain-body accounts of magnitude representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.