ArticlePLOS digital health2026
A single-camera video-based assessment of locomotive syndrome using pose-silhouette fusion model.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locomotive syndrome (LS), characterized by declining mobility due to musculoskeletal disorders, significantly affects older adults and is highly prevalent in Japan. Early detection and intervention are crucial to mitigate disease progression and preserve quality of life. Current diagnostic methods rely on subjective self-reports and labor-intensive clinical assessments, underscoring the need for automated, objective, and scalable screening tools. Building on our previous work, this study presents an updated deep learning-based computer vision model for LS screening using single-camera walking videos. We collected 511 walking videos from 178 participants clinically classified into four LS stages (non-LS, stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3). We used the MMPose framework to extract 2D body keypoints and generated silhouette-based Gait Energy Images (GEIs) from seven frames automatically sampled from fixed 40-frame walking windows to capture complementary gait-shape information. Model performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation based on held-out evaluation-window predictions, while ensuring that windows from the same participant and the same walking video were not split across training, validation, and test sets. We also evaluated an independent external validation cohort of 33 cases (LS0-1, n = 15; LS2-3, n = 18). In internal validation, the pose-estimation model achieved sensitivity of 0.9440 and an AUC of 0.9668, whereas the silhouette model showed specificity of 0.9085 and an AUC of 0.9191. Fusion models outperformed the individual approaches, with the highest F1-score (0.908) at a 60:40 pose-to-silhouette ratio and the highest AUC (0.971) at a 70:30 ratio. In external validation, the score-fusion model achieved 90.9% accuracy, 88.9% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, a macro-F1 score of 0.909, and an AUC of 0.967. In conclusion, integrating pose-estimation and silhouette-based features substantially improves the accuracy and clinical utility of automated LS screening. This low-burden approach provides a practical bridge between population-level screening and definitive clinical assessment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.