ArticlePloS one2026
An art style classification network integrating contrastive learning and counterfactual attention.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Art style classification is a fundamental task for digital art analysis and intelligent cultural heritage management. However, existing methods often fail to deliver stable and interpretable results due to dispersed style cues, complex local textures, strong interference from background and subject content, and the difficulty of identifying regions that are causally relevant to style recognition. To address these issues, we propose a Multi Source Collaborative Style Network, termed MCS-Net, which jointly models global composition and local brushstroke textures within a unified framework. MCS-Net consists of four modules, namely a basic style feature encoding module, an attention generation module, a style contrastive learning module, and a counterfactual attention module. The attention generation module discovers multiple complementary discriminative regions. The contrastive learning module constructs a more discriminative embedding space to improve the separability of fine-grained styles. The counterfactual attention module builds counterfactual attention samples to explicitly estimate the true contribution of regions to predictions, thereby suppressing spurious activations, improving robustness, and providing counterfactual-supported evidence for model interpretation. Experiments on three public datasets, WikiArt, MultitaskPainting100k, and Pandora18k, demonstrate that MCS-Net outperforms representative baselines across standard evaluation metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.