ArticlePloS one2026
Assessing reader reception of Arthur Waley's English translation of Journey to the West: A topic modeling and sentiment analysis approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arthur Waley's 1942 abridged translation, Monkey: Journey to the West, remains one of the most influential and widely debated English renderings of this Chinese classic. Despite its extensive global cultural impact, the contemporary online reception has remained largely unexplored. This study applies an integrated computational framework - combining BERTopic topic modelling, Twitter-RoBERTa sentiment classification, and GPT-4o-assisted qualitative validation - to analyse 796 English-language reader reviews of Waley's translation collected from Amazon and Goodreads. The study aims to systematically investigate the contemporary online reception, identify the thematic concerns and interpretive patterns of English-language readers, exploring the dynamics of its cross-cultural dissemination. The findings indicate that Monkey is generally well received among international readers (43.12% positive sentiment), driven by appreciation for Waley's colloquial prose, Sun Wukong's appeal as a trickster-hero, and the translation's cross-cultural philosophical resonance and humour. Conversely, negative feedback (18.30%) is associated with structural tensions with Western narrative and heroic conventions, insufficient paratextual guidance for cultural interpretation, and ineffective multimodal delivery - most notably, British-accented audiobook narrations. The study concludes that the global circulation of Monkey is shaped by a complex interplay of translation strategies, reader cultural schemas, and multimodal delivery formats. Furthermore, this hybrid methodological approach offers a replicable empirical framework for investigating international reception of Chinese literary classics in the digital era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.