ArticlePloS one2026
Nitrate contamination characteristics and health risk assessment of groundwater in the typical area of the lower Yellow River Basin.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nitrate is a key indicator for assessing groundwater quality, and nitrate pollution in groundwater poses a threat to water security and ecological health in the Yellow River Basin. Taking the Changxiao hydrogeological unit as an example, this paper studies the characteristics, influencing factors and health risks of nitrate pollution in groundwater by using nitrate pollution index, hierarchical cluster analysis, factor analysis, Monte Carlo simulation and human health risk assessment. The results show that the average concentration of NO3--N is 19.48 mg/L, with pore water exhibiting the highest levels, followed by karst water and then fissure water in terms of average concentration. The average nitrate pollution index is 3.31, and 50% of the samples are severely polluted with nitrate. The pollution is mainly distributed in densely populated areas, especially near Xiaoli Town, Guide Town and Ancheng Town. Both anthropogenic and natural factors affect the groundwater chemical field in the study area. In areas with serious nitrate pollution, the impact of human activities is particularly serious. Probabilistic health risk assessment shows that the probabilities of potential risks posed by nitrate in pore water to children and adults are 24.37% and 6.67%, respectively; and in karst water, the probabilities to children and adults are 24.83% and 3.64%, respectively. The potential risk of nitrate to adults is far less than that to children who requires special attention. According to sensitivity analysis, the concentration of nitrate is the main variable affecting health risk assessment, which should be paid attention to reduce health risks. These results provide a scientific basis for groundwater pollution control and rational water resource management in both the study area and the lower Yellow River reaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.