ArticlePloS one2026
A curriculum-integrated sun safety intervention to improve adolescent skin health knowledge in an independent girls' secondary school.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Australia has one of the world's highest melanoma incidences among youth. Adolescents often under-prioritise sun protection due to sociocultural factors, for example, the perceived attractiveness of tanned skin and a sense of invulnerability. This study reports on a curriculum-integrated sun safety intervention implemented in a single independent girls' secondary school, a context that provides important insights but also limits generalisability to mixed-gender and other school settings. High school students (aged 13-15) participated in sun safety workshops integrated into their Personal Development, Health, and Physical Education (PDHPE) curriculum. Sun protection knowledge, attitudes toward tanning, and self-reported protective behaviours were assessed via surveys administered pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and five months later. Students' sun safety knowledge increased significantly post-intervention (p < 0.001), and remained higher than baseline knowledge at 6 months, indicating substantial knowledge retention. Participants reported more frequent sunscreen use and protective behaviours after the program. The intervention also reduced the appeal of tanning, fewer students agreed that "a suntan looks good" after participating. Notably, all students regardless of ethnicity (Caucasian, Asian, Other), showed knowledge gains, but variations were observed. Students from historically underserved ethnic backgrounds started with lower baseline knowledge and exhibited slightly smaller improvements aligning with prior findings that sun awareness has differed across racial/ethnic group. These findings suggest that an engaging, curriculum-integrated sun safety program can produce immediate and sustained improvements in adolescents' sun protection knowledge and attitudes within a girls' secondary school context. While the single-site design limits broader generalisation, the results highlight the potential value of embedding sun safety education within school curricula. Future research should examine the effectiveness of this intervention across multiple school sites, including co-educational and diverse educational settings, to strengthen evidence for scalability and policy implementation aimed at long-term skin cancer prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.