Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42361031›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Enhancing breath-based diagnostics through eXplainable Artificial Intelligence.

Andrea Lo Sasso, Nicola Amoroso, Domenico Diacono, Marianna La Rocca, Alfonso Monaco, Ester Pantaleo, Sabina Tangaro, Loredana Bellantuono, Roberto Bellotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrea Lo SassoDipartimento Interuniversitario di Fisica "M. Merlin", Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Nicola AmorosoIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Domenico DiaconoIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-5805
Marianna La RoccaDipartimento Interuniversitario di Fisica "M. Merlin", Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Alfonso MonacoDipartimento Interuniversitario di Fisica "M. Merlin", Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Ester PantaleoDipartimento Interuniversitario di Fisica "M. Merlin", Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8407-9032
Sabina TangaroIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Loredana BellantuonoIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-2675
Roberto BellottiDipartimento Interuniversitario di Fisica "M. Merlin", Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breath analysis is emerging as a non-invasive and promising diagnostic approach capable of assessing a patient's metabolic state by detecting volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath. This study investigates the potential of breath analysis for the early detection of lung cancer, respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases using open-access data from three distinct datasets. An artificial intelligence methodology is implemented to predict diagnostic labels while addressing class imbalance, an inherent challenge in medical datasets. After evaluating model performance and stability, the most relevant volatile organic compounds identified by the best-performing model for each dataset are analyzed. Using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence, the influence of volatile organic compound abundances on predictions is examined, enabling the identification of key variables and improving model interpretability. The proposed methodology provides a robust framework for breath-based diagnostics, emphasizing the potential of integrating breath analysis with machine learning to advance clinical decision-making despite ongoing challenges related to sampling variability, detection sensitivity, and standardization across studies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLung NeoplasmsVolatile Organic CompoundsBreath TestsHumansMachine LearningVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID42361031
PMCPMC13308859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.