ArticlePloS one2026
Enhancing breath-based diagnostics through eXplainable Artificial Intelligence.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breath analysis is emerging as a non-invasive and promising diagnostic approach capable of assessing a patient's metabolic state by detecting volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath. This study investigates the potential of breath analysis for the early detection of lung cancer, respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases using open-access data from three distinct datasets. An artificial intelligence methodology is implemented to predict diagnostic labels while addressing class imbalance, an inherent challenge in medical datasets. After evaluating model performance and stability, the most relevant volatile organic compounds identified by the best-performing model for each dataset are analyzed. Using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence, the influence of volatile organic compound abundances on predictions is examined, enabling the identification of key variables and improving model interpretability. The proposed methodology provides a robust framework for breath-based diagnostics, emphasizing the potential of integrating breath analysis with machine learning to advance clinical decision-making despite ongoing challenges related to sampling variability, detection sensitivity, and standardization across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.