ArticlePloS one2026
Optimizing an ethanol-based fixative for enhanced nucleic acid preservation in cervical samples using a central composite design approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo accurately diagnose cervical cancer, high-quality genetic material (DNA and RNA) from clinical samples is crucial. Current preservation methods often have limitations, including poor RNA stability and safety concerns. This study aimed to develop an optimized ethanol-based fixative to preserve DNA and RNA in cervical samples under ambient conditions.
methodsHeLa cells were fixed in ethanol-based fixatives containing polyhydric compounds (Sorbitol and polyethylene glycol [PEG]) and chelating agents. We used a central composite design (CCD) approach to evaluate the effects of pH, Sorbitol concentration, and PEG concentration on nucleic acid preservation. DNA and RNA quality were assessed using agarose gel electrophoresis, PCR, and real-time PCR. Cellular morphology was evaluated using Papanicolaou-stained slides. HPV genotyping of clinical samples was conducted using real-time PCR.
resultsThe optimized fixative, developed in this study consisted of 40% ethanol, 4.3% Sorbitol, 1.2% PEG 8000, with a pH of 5.6. This new formula significantly improved DNA and RNA preservation compared to the commercial solution, PreservCyt. DNA showed high integrity and was successfully amplified in PCR test targeting HPV-18 oncogenes. RNA quality was confirmed through clear 28S and 18S rRNA bands and lower threshold cycle (Ct) values in qRT-PCR. HPV genotyping and morphological analysis revealed excellent preservation, enabling both molecular and cytological evaluations.
conclusionThe new ethanol-based fixative represents a promising cost-effective and environmentally friendly solution for preserving nucleic acids and cellular morphology in cervical samples. Its good performance under ambient conditions suggests it may serve as an option for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing and cervical cancer prevention, particularly in places with limited resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.