ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
Molecular and Clinical Determinants of Targeted Therapy Treatment in Biliary Tract Cancer.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeActionable genomic alterations occur in all anatomic subsets of biliary tract cancer; however, targeted therapies have not shown a survival advantage over cytotoxics, and resistance mechanisms require further characterization. EXPERIMENTAL
designWe analyzed a prospectively maintained cohort of 1,254 patients with histologically confirmed biliary tract cancer who underwent molecular profiling using an FDA-authorized targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay. We defined actionable alterations across anatomic subsets, compared outcomes with targeted therapy versus cytotoxics, and evaluated genomic correlates of resistance using longitudinal samples.
resultsOverall, 59% of patients harbored at least one OncoKB alteration, and 32.2% (intrahepatic 40%, extrahepatic 15%, and gallbladder 22%) had a level 1/2 alteration. Emerging targets included KRAS alterations (17%), MTAP deletions (12.8%), MDM2 amplification (6.5%), and MET amplification (1.5%). Targeted therapy was associated with improved progression-free survival but not overall survival. Co-occurring TP53/RAS pathway and SMAD4 alterations were associated with inferior outcomes in IDH1/FGFR2-and ERBB2-driven tumors, respectively. Longitudinal profiling demonstrated ERBB2 loss in ERBB2-driven tumors, whereas IDH-, FGFR-, BRAF-, and NTRK-driven tumors retained the primary oncogenic driver. Acquired resistance was associated with alterations in RAS, MEK, MET, MYC, and CDKN2A.
conclusionsThis comprehensive molecular profiling study illustrates the real-world utility and limitations of targeted NGS of biliary tract cancer and affirms the use of precision medicine in patients with these diseases. Genomic heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance observed in this study has the potential to inform ongoing drug development efforts for biliary tract cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.