ArticleJournal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT2026
A Sensory Adaptation Program for Individuals With Mal de Débarquement Syndrome: A Case Series.
Article in Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeMal de débarquement syndrome (MdDS) is a rare disorder characterized by persistent oscillatory sensations following exposure to prolonged passive motion. Inadequate readaptation of the sensory balance systems may contribute to MdDS symptoms. Sensory adaptation exercises modify sensory input to improve balance and reduce symptoms; however, research on this intervention in MdDS is limited. The purpose of this case series was to describe a sensory adaptation program for individuals with MdDS and report changes in perceived severity of oscillatory motion, balance, and patient-reported function. Feasibility was also examined retrospectively. CASE DESCRIPTION: Ten participants (mean age = 64.4 years [standard deviation: 11.7]; 8 women) with MdDS completed the study. Outcomes assessed at baseline and post-intervention included: perceived severity of oscillatory motion (Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]); balance (Modified Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction on Balance and Functional Gait Assessment); patient-reported function (Patient Specific Functional Scale 2.0 [PSFS 2.0]); and feasibility (retention, adherence, safety, and acceptability). The PSFS 2.0 and NRS were repeated at 3-month post-intervention.
interventionParticipants completed 9 intervention sessions over 3 weeks. Interventions included education, sensory adaptation, and functional mobility. OUTCOMES: All participants completed the study, no adverse events were reported, and clinically meaningful improvements on the Visual Analog Scale, NRS, Functional Gait Assessment, and PSFS 2.0 were observed. Seven of 10 participants sustained improvement on the PSFS 2.0, and 6 of 10 sustained improvement on NRS at 3 months. DISCUSSION: The sensory adaptation program was feasible, and improvements in perceived oscillatory motion, dynamic gait, and patient-reported function were observed. Future efficacy studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.