ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) use in adults with haemoglobin SC disease: A real-world study in Quebec.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) in haemoglobin SC disease: Moving from therapeutic hesitation to evidence-guided care.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Haemoglobin SC (HbSC) disease is the second most prevalent form of sickle cell disease, but evidence for hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide; HU) to prevent pain episodes was limited until the prospective identification of variables as outcomes for treatment (PIVOT) trial. To assess HU effectiveness and safety in adults with HbSC, we conducted a retrospective, single-centre, pre-post cohort study at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal. Patients initiated HU between January 2010 and July 2025. Effectiveness analysis required ≥12 months of pre-HU follow-up; patients with shorter follow-up were included for the safety analysis only. The primary end-point was the change in the annual frequency of a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) composite (VOCC: VOC, acute chest syndrome, priapism, splenic/hepatic sequestration) from 12 months pre-HU to months 4-16 post-HU. Secondary end-points included adverse events (AEs), treatment effectiveness and reasons for HU discontinuation. Of 263 patients assessed, 110 were included in the safety analysis and 75 in the effectiveness analysis. HU reduced mean VOCC by 56% (0.57-0.25; Δ = -0.32 ± 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.51, -0.13]; p = 0.0015). Haematological AEs were mostly mild (thrombocytopenia, 32.7%; neutropenia, 23.6%; leucopenia, 20.9%); bilirubin elevations were the most frequent non-haematological AE (10.9%), all asymptomatic and without clinical hepatotoxicity. In conclusion, HU was associated with a meaningful reduction in VOCC and was generally well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.